![]() ![]() ‘a recipe’, but if you want to adjust the portion size eaten on separate occasions you have to first adjust the separate amounts of the individual ingredients to try and tally it somewhere near what you actually consume. Or just as annoying: you construct the recipe X in the program and then have to guess how many servings it usually makes. But what if you don’t know how many servings an unknown recipie makes or it’s one you invented on the spot!? Whatever, both are tedious Lets say it usually makes about 4 servings, so then when you want to add your portion size of recipe X that day you have to add it as 0.25 of a serving of recipe- OK but not very streamlined or flexible. ![]() In fact, the reason why I like Fitday so much is that the customised food part of the program recalculates for different portion sizes (based on the volume or weight you enter) easily once you have added the calorie+nutrition for a given weight in the first instance. When I was much younger and used to train seriously I used to have a simple excel spreadsheet that would be able to do that- it was crude but still enabled me to get basic calorie information for any portion size!Īnyways, my opinions don’t matter much in the whole scheme of things here, especially when you guys have lots of swish programmers! I’ll buzz off now and simply thank you for a great piece of software that is inspiring me to get fit again ! But I hope you change the metric system bits I mentioned before, some of us remain connected to Europe! Love your work Seems only a little tweek to add this great recalculation feature onto a recipe constructor. I guess the strength of a product is its ease of use and how often you use it.įor building a custom food from a recipe, I use. It used to be just, and I've been using it for a long time. It's not as easy to use as fitday but for custom recipes, you just have to put in the work and then enter the data in fitday as a custom food. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |